🔗 Share this article

One year ago, the landscape was completely separate. Ahead of the American presidential vote, thoughtful residents could recognize the nation's significant faults – its injustices and disparity – yet they could still see it as the US. A democratic nation. A land where legal governance carried weight. A country led by a honorable and upright public servant, even with his advanced age and growing weakness.

These days, as October 2025 ends, numerous citizens barely recognize the country we reside in. Persons believed to be illegal immigrants are rounded up and shoved into vans, sometimes refused legal rights. The left side of the presidential residence – is being destroyed to build a lavish ballroom. Donald Trump is persecuting his opponents or alleged foes and demanding the justice department transfer an enormous amount of citizen dollars. Armed military personnel are dispatched across metropolitan centers with deceptive justifications. The defense headquarters, relabeled the Department of War, has – in effect – liberated itself of day-to-day journalistic scrutiny while it uses possibly reaching nearly $1tn of taxpayer money. Colleges, law firms, journalism organizations are yielding from leader's menaces, and rich magnates are handled as aristocracy.

“The United States, only a few months ahead of its quarter-millennium anniversary as the world’s leading democracy, has tipped over the brink into autocracy and totalitarianism,” an American historian, commented in August. “Finally, faster than I thought feasible, it occurred in this country.”

Each day begins to new horrors. And it is challenging to understand – and painful to realize – how deeply lost we are, and how quickly it occurred.

Nevertheless, it is known that the president was legitimately chosen. Despite his highly troubling initial presidency and following the warnings that came with the knowledge of Project 2025 – following the leader directly declared plainly he would be a dictator solely at the start – a majority of citizens elected him over his Democratic opponent.

While alarming as the present situation may be, it's more daunting to realize that we have only been nine months into this administration. Where will three more years of this deterioration leave us? And suppose the three years becomes a more extended duration, because there is no one to stop this leader from deciding that a third term is essential, perhaps for national security reasons?

Granted, not everything is hopeless. We will have legislative votes the coming year which might bring a different governmental control, should Democrats recapture the Senate or House of parliament. There exist government representatives who are attempting to impose a degree of oversight, such as representatives who are initiating an inquiry concerning the try to money grab by federal prosecutors.

And a leadership election in 2028 could begin the path toward restoration just as the prior selection put us on this regrettable path.

There exist numerous residents marching in public spaces throughout communities, like they performed in the past days in the No Kings rallies.

An ex-cabinet member, stated lately that “the slumbering force of the US is stirring”, exactly as before post-McCarthyism in the 1950s or during anti-war demonstrations or during the seventies crisis.

In those instances, the unstable nation eventually was righted.

The author states he understands the indicators of that resurgence and observes it occurring now. For proof, he points to the recent massive protests, the extensive, cross-party resistance to a television host's removal and the near-unanimous rejection by reporters to accept military mandates they solely cover approved content.

“The slumbering entity consistently stays inactive till specific greed becomes so noxious, some action so contemptuous of the common good, some brutality so loud, that the giant is forced except to rise.”

It’s an optimistic take, and I appreciate Reich’s experienced view. Possibly he may be validated.

In the meantime, the crucial issues persist: will the nation regain its footing? Can it retrieve its standing internationally and its adherence to constitutional order?

Or must we acknowledge that the 250-year-old experiment succeeded temporarily, and then – suddenly, utterly – failed?

My pessimistic brain suggests that the second option is correct; that everything might be gone. My positive feelings, however, advises me that we must try, by any means available.

Personally, working in journalism analysis, that involves pushing media professionals to commit, more fully, to their purpose of holding power to account. For different individuals, it may be participating in political races, or coordinating protests, or finding ways to safeguard electoral access.

Less than a year ago, we were in an alternate reality. Twelve months later? Or in several years? The fact is, we cannot predict. Our sole course is to strive to continue fighting.

What Provides Me Optimism Currently

The contact I encounter in the classroom with aspiring reporters, who are both visionary and grounded, {always